Module E - Evaluation of the MiKlip decadal prediction system

Module E is evaluating hindcasts from the MiKlip decadal prediction system focusing the main pillars: i) generation of observational data sets and their use for an improved validation of hindcasts, ii) hindcast verification, i.e. the development and implementation of procedures for a quantitative estimation of forecast quality, and iii) process-oriented validation to enhance the understanding and thus the credibility of the prediction system and its products.

Working towards an operational system in MiKlip II, an additional focus comes up: the transfer of predictions from the MiKlip system into probabilistic forecast products for users. This implies a) bias correction of predictions taking a model drift and a climate trend into account, b) calibration of probabilistic forecasts to increase reliability, and c) the construction of forecasts for user-relevant quantities and events, such as heat-waves, droughts, storm surges or other kinds of large-scale climate anomalies.

These pillars define five Module E objectives paving the way towards a useroriented operational system:
1. Bias and Drift correction, Calibration
2. User-oriented post-processing
3. Process-oriented validation
4. Generation of data sets
5. Hindcast verification

MIMOC: A global monthly isopycnal upper-ocean climatology with mixed layers

2015 - J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, Vol. 118 (3), pp. 1658–1672

Schmidtko, S. | G. C. Johnson, and J. M. Lyman

Ensemble size impact on the decadal predictive skill assessment

2015 - Meteorologische Zeitschrift Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 645-655

Sienz, F. | H. Pohlmann, and W.A. Müller

A Climatology of Tornadoes in Europe: Results from the European Severe Weather Database

2014 - Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 142 (12), pp. 4775-4790

Groenemeijer, P. | T. Kühne

Evaluating decadal predictions of northern hemispheric cyclone frequencies

2014 - Tellus A 2014, Vol. 66, 22830

Kruschke, T. | H.W. Rust, C. Kadow, G.C. Leckebusch, U. Ulbrich

Decadal climate predictions for the period 1901–2010 with a coupled climate model

2014 - Geophys. Res. Lett., Vol. 41 (6), pp. 2100–2107

Müller, W. A. | H. Pohlmann, F. Sienz, and D. Smith

Contact

Freie Universität Berlin, Institute for Meteorology
Prof. Dr. Uwe Ulbrich

Freie Universität Berlin, Institute for Meteorology
Dr. Jens Grieger